logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.04.17 2013고정98
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2012, the Defendant, at the time of soup, made soup a soup, made soup to C, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information, stating that “F removed KRW 100,000,000,000 from the books without recording in G, his/her son and woman’s son and son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statements made by witnesses H and D in the fourth trial records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the entry of F and G in the fifth trial records;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On January 2012, the Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act argues that the Defendant did not impair the honor of the victim by pointing out false facts and pointing out that “F removed KRW 100,000,000,000, which was supported by D from the books without entering them in the books.”

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence: (a) in this court, H did not state that “F was removed from the register without entering 100,000 won supported by D”; (b) in the middle-term patrol force center on January 2012, H stated that the Defendant was “F was removed from the register,” but I and the J stated that H demanded the Defendant to make the above remarks at the above temporary location; (c) it was recognized that H made the above remarks to the Defendant at the above temporary location, but (d) the Defendant did not ask H of the grounds or developments leading up to the above remarks; and (e) the Defendant did not actually supported D in the senior patrol center; and (e) whether there was a fact that H provided the above remarks to D with KRW 10,000.

arrow