The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 8, 2017, the Defendant, around 14:30, engaged in wing practice with golf loans from the second floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City building C’s “D golf practice site.”

In this case, there was a duty of care to safely carry out wing practice at a sufficient distance after checking whether there is a person around the area.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and instead engaged in a wing wing wing wing operations, and the Defendant saw the head of the victim E (the age of fifty-three) into golf wing operations, and suffered approximately two open measures necessary for the victim to receive approximately one week medical treatment.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the records of this case, namely, “gy course safety rules” attached to the front straw machines, stating that “the prohibition of access to the front straws other than a straw,” “the prohibition of string practice on a passage,” “the prohibition of string practice,” and “the front string straws in the course of mechanical operation,” which led the users of the string to the string of the front straws in the direction of another person’s string in the course of mechanical operation; ② the operation of the machinery from the front straws of the front straws was normal operation behavior; ② the operation of the machinery from the front straws was close to the front straws of the front straws; ③ the Defendant was engaged in the string practice outside the front straws by manipulating the machinery to the front straws of the front straws.

(4) When a wing is carried out on the wing in the provisions of a golf practice course, the wing is not sufficient to acknowledge the existence of the wing person’s operation of the machinery on the side of the machinery that is not his own string, and there is a duty of care to check whether the wing person operates the machinery on the side of the machinery that is not his own string.

In light of the above, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that the defendant was negligent in the occurrence of the instant case without reasonable doubt.

It is insufficient to view.

Then, this case.