logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.11.19 2013가단29317
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 32,101,210 to Plaintiff A; KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff B; KRW 1,000,000 to Plaintiff C and D; and each of the above.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 20, 2013, around 11:24, the Defendant was running a golf wing practice on the 12st place located in Ulsan Nam-gu G golf driving range (hereinafter “instant golf driving range”). On the 13st place behind the Defendant’s order, Plaintiff A entered the 13st place behind the Defendant’s order and sought a golf string on the right edge of the same string place, and suffered injury, such as inside and undermining the right edge part of the golf wing, while the Defendant doing so.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The distance between the instant golf driving range is about 2.7 meters, and if a wing is ordinarily conducted on a normal ground in another place, the scope of wing does not exceed another person’s string. However, when wing is conducted on a normal ground, the Defendant, when manufacturing a wing on a normal ground, wing range goes beyond another person’s wing range.

At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant followed the instant accident, and was doing wing in practice.

C. Meanwhile, Plaintiff B’s husband, Plaintiff C, and D are Plaintiff A’s children.

[Reasons for Recognition] 1 and 3 Evidence, result of on-site verification by this Court, witness H's testimony, whole purport of oral argument

2. According to the occurrence of liability for damages and the recognition of the above restriction, although the defendant has a duty to pay attention to avoid the price of other persons beyond his own golf debt to the next strings, the defendant caused the instant accident involving the plaintiff's price wing exceeding his own strings and thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs' damages caused by the instant accident.

I would like to say.

On the other hand, when the plaintiff Gap entered his own stone and set a golf hole, the defendant was doing a wing at another stone, and therefore, he entered another stone with due care for the defendant's behavior.

arrow