logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2013.07.25 2013고단94
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant forged a private document related to an application for the re-issuance of a resident registration certificate, and the uttering of a falsified document, taking advantage of his pro-friendly C’s possession of a photograph evidencing his/her pro-friendly C’s resident registration certificate, has

On March 23, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the public service center of the public service center of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoul, on March 23, 2012, the Defendant submitted a paper stating the victim’s resident registration number (E) and C’s resident registration number (E) and address (Seoul F) as he/she himself/herself is C; (b) made the said D enter C’s resident registration number and address in the form of the re-issuance of resident registration certificate on the computer network; (c) made the said D enter the resident registration number and address of C in the form of the re-issuance of resident registration certificate on which C’s resident registration number and address are recorded, and written “G” in the telephone number column and signed it in C in the signature column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for the re-issuance of the resident registration certificate in C, which is a private document.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, exercised the forged resident registration certificate to the above D, who is an employee who is aware of such forgery, as if the application form for the re-issuance of the forged resident registration certificate was a document duly formed.

2. The Defendant, as indicated in paragraph 1, forged a private document related to the opening of a post office account, falsified an application for the re-issuance of a resident registration certificate, and violated the Resident Registration Act, using a written confirmation of the application for the issuance of the resident registration certificate issued by forging and uttering it as C, reported an accident to the post office account in the name of C as if the passbook, etc. was lost, and intended to change the password of the relevant account and to open a new account in the name of C.

On March 27, 2012, the Defendant who forged a private document.

arrow