logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.03 2018가단5277511
임금
Text

1. The defendant,

A. As to Plaintiff A, KRW 7,383,301, KRW 6,552,102, and each said money, from April 6, 2018;

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of the evidence Nos. 1 through 8 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, each of the plaintiffs' evidence Nos. 1 and 8, the plaintiffs were employed by the defendant and filed with the defendant for a summary order of KRW 5,000,000 on March 22, 2018, the plaintiff C was until March 21, 2018, the plaintiff D was up to March 12, 2018, the plaintiff Eul was up to February 8, 2018, the plaintiff E was up to February 27, 2018, and the plaintiff F was retired before February 27, 2018, and the defendant did not pay each wage as stated in the Disposition No. 1. The defendant's representative first received a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 from the plaintiffs, and the above court was affirmed by a fine of KRW 200,000, Apr. 12, 2019.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay Plaintiff A the amount of KRW 7,383,301, KRW 6,52,102 from April 6, 2018 on the day following the 14th day after the date of retirement to Plaintiff B; KRW 4,855,802 from April 5, 2018 on the day following the 14th day after the date of retirement to Plaintiff C; KRW 5,860,046 from March 27, 2018 on the day following the 14th day after the date of retirement to Plaintiff D; KRW 3,70,000 from the date following the 14th day after the date of retirement to Plaintiff E; KRW 3,00,000 from February 23, 2018 on the day after the 14th day after the date of retirement to 3,100,000 and delay damages from the 20th day after the 314th day after the date of retirement.

2. The defendant's assertion that the amount of unpaid wages is KRW 3,692,307, Plaintiff B3,238,060, Plaintiff C2,856,694, Plaintiff D2,921,794, but it is not sufficient to recognize the above assertion solely on the basis of each description of the evidence in subparagraphs B and 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion.

arrow