logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.19 2017나56864
어선 소유자변경등록 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420

From September 28, 2012, Defendant B and Defendant B concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff to purchase the instant fishing vessel from the Plaintiff. It is reasonable to deem that Defendant B terminated the instant title trust agreement and Defendant B entered into a sales contract with the Plaintiff to purchase the instant fishing vessel from the Plaintiff on or around September 28, 2012 in the 5th 12th eth 19th eth 8th 8th eth 19th eth 19th “201.4.6th 201” to be deleted from the 7th G to the 8th 17th eth 8th eth 19th eth 19th eth 2012.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow