Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 8 months, Defendant C and D for 4 months, Defendant E and F, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C proposed that they receive large amount of insurance proceeds in disguised traffic accidents. Defendant C, who consented to the proposal, reported to the insurance company as if the traffic accident occurred due to shocking of Defendant B’s Hexcar vehicle, and reported it to the insurance company as if the traffic accident occurred. Defendant A, by taking part in the role of checking the traffic accident against the insurance company’s employees, was willing to receive insurance proceeds from the insurance company’s employees.

On December 7, 2012, the Defendants proposed that, as planned in advance, Defendant B “IG insurance companies have caused an accident on the day of snow, and requested the acceptance of the insurance company to receive the traffic accident”, and Defendant C stated that, around 23:06 on the same day, the victim LIG insurance companies “the occurrence of a traffic accident by driving a G New FFcar car on the road located in the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic eth

However, in fact, Defendant B was not negligent in causing traffic accidents since he was driven by the said new framework vehicle at his own residence located in Ischeon-si I and intentionally parked therein.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, and the Defendants received a total of KRW 6.5 million from the Agricultural Cooperative Account in J as the vehicle repair cost, the agreed deposit, and KRW 3.822,00,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim.

2. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant D’s joint criminal conduct proposed that they receive high-amount insurance money in disguised traffic accidents, and Defendant D’s consent to the payment of insurance money is driving of Defendant B’s vehicle outside the new framework.