Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, it shall be for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on May 24, 1995. A

On January 16, 2013, the Defendant sent B and once sexual intercourse from Fpenta in Gyeonggi-si E.

B. On April 2013, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with the above B at the Monael where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Songpa-gu Seoul Mona’s movement.

C. On July 19, 2013, the Defendant sent sexual intercourses with the above B at the Mosel where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Airbling.

The Defendant, as above, went through three times with the above B.

2. Defendant B knew that the above Defendant was a spouse of the above A, and had sexual intercourses with A three times, as described in paragraph (1), respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution (as to the defendant B, Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (as to the defendant B), Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (as to the first criminal defendant and against the wrong defendant);