1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The reasons for this part are as stated in the part of “1. Basic Facts” in the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the case where the reasoning for this part is written or added as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. On the other hand, “the Defendant and the co-defendants of the first instance court” under Section 10 of the second instance court’s judgment shall be deemed to be “the Defendant’s indication on the first instance court’s judgment and each of the “the Plaintiff’s list” under the 9th instance court’s judgment appears to be “the Defendant’s list”. On the other hand, Defendant 22,00,000 won on March 6, 2016, the remitter of the amount on the date of the No. 1953, March 28, 2016, KRW 30,000,000 on March 30, 2016, KRW 100,000,000 on April 30, 2016, the Plaintiff received KRW 100,000,000 on June 30, 2016 as follows.

I undertake to liquidate the model royalty costs together at the time of selling (B and one other) the land on which the contract deposit is paid by the Defendant’s letter of undertaking.

(400 million won: On April 2015, the Defendant entered the Defendant’s name, resident number, and contact number in the documents (Article 3-1, hereinafter “instant letter”) stating the following as a patrol officer, and delivered the Plaintiff with a seal imprint affixed by the Defendant’s name attached thereto.

E. The AL company A, which has written the Plaintiff’s agreement, agrees to agree upon the settlement of accounts related to Crental Housing Association Model Epis in the amount of KRW 250 million, and will not raise any objection to LB complaint.

(L) Liquidators pay A the amount recovered after filing a complaint: The F of the C Rental Housing Association receives 250 million won as the construction cost in accordance with the Defendant’s proposal on March 2016, 2016, and when embezzlement (100 million won) is recovered from the former L, the remainder of the construction cost shall be paid. The F of the Plaintiff and the non-party partnership shall be present in company with the Defendant around that time.