1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from August 11, 2018 to November 22, 2019, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s report, etc. 1) The Plaintiff is the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”).

(3) On October 10, 1982, the Plaintiff installed the deceased’s grave No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as “instant grave”). On October 10, 1982, the Plaintiff installed the deceased’s grave No. 1954, Dec. 1, 1982

(2) On September 2016, the Defendant publicly announced the reburial of the instant grave to the effect that “In order to develop a single grave for the instant grave as a park according to the E development project, it shall be deemed that there is an agreement with the relative about the burial of the grave reported under the Act on Funeral Services, Etc., and that the unclaimed grave shall be voluntarily opened after the period of public announcement expires.”

3) Around November 2016, the Plaintiff reported that the instant grave was a fluence grave to the public official of the Defendant Military Service, and received a certificate of relocation from the Defendant on April 17, 2017, after filing a report on the reburial on April 14, 2017. (B) The Defendant entered into a contract for the reburial of the instant grave and for the reburial of the neglected grave around April 7, 2017.

2) On April 25, 2017, the Defendant deemed the instant grave as an unclaimed grave and filed a relocation report on the said grave on May 201, 2017, and filed a relocation report on the said 17 unclaimed grave. 3) On May 11, 2017, the seed and seedling industry buried the instant grave and buried the remains, and buried 135 remains, including the decedent’s remains, in G crematorium located in the Masung-gunFF, the 135 remains, and buried part of the remains buried on May 24, 2017, in the “I” located in the Gocho-gun, Gocho-gun.

4) Since then, the Defendant knew that the instant grave had been opened, the Plaintiff was sealed in K of the said I Facility J room. 5) Meanwhile, G crematorium had one equipment as a reburial for cremation, the number of remains available for cremation as a single cremation is eight, and the maximum number of remains available for cremation per day is eight.

C. The Plaintiff’s heir L, the deceased’s heir L, the deceased’s spouse N, the son’s P, and Samnam Q, the Plaintiff around June 2019.