beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
25,344,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
2. The defendant.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[Defendant B’s criminal records] On March 24, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced Defendant B to two months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the re-election of electronic records, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on June 25, 2011.
Defendant
C On October 24, 2014, the Busan District Court sentenced one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Immigration Control Act at the Busan District Court on November 1, 2014, which became final and conclusive on November 1, 2014.
[Status of the Defendants] Defendant D was appointed as K with the outer traffic upper part on May 19, 1982, and was employed from January 28, 201 to August 23, 201, as L to be in charge of visa issuance at the Embassy and consulate of the Republic of Korea in Vietnam, from January 28, 2011 to August 23, 2014, and was retired on December 31, 2014.
Defendant
A is the friendship of Defendant D, who operates the “M” tourer in Seodaemun-gu Seoul.
Defendant
B. C after inviting Korean enterprises to invite Vietnam who wish to enter the Republic of Korea in Vietnam under the false name of export counseling with Vietnam, C wishes to visit Korea to the Korean consular missions stationed in Vietnam for export and import counseling with the invited companies.
“A person who has arranged the issuance of a visa to the effect that the application for the issuance of the visa was made on behalf of the business visa and received the price in the manner of receiving it.”
[Criminal facts] 2015 Gohap 445
1. While Defendant B and C’s co-criminals tried to operate a visa brokerage business with Vietnam from around September 2012 and sought ways to receive visa issuance smoothly, Defendant C, who has a close relationship with D with D by using it and frequently offered money and valuables or gifts to D, made a smooth visa issuance, and conspired to pay to D each price of USD 1,000 per capita (hereinafter “U.S. dollars”) whenever the visa is issued.
A. 1) On November 9, 2012, the Defendants offering a bribe to D with a view to continuously requesting the issuance of a visa.