Defendants shall be punished by fine 1,00,000.

Defendant

A and C fail to pay the above fine, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as a representative director of B corporation, a person who operates the above company, and Defendant B corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of automobile management business.

Defendant

C is a person who actually operates D Co., Ltd., and Defendant D Co., Ltd is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling industrial machinery.

1. Any person who intends to install a pollutant A emission facility of air pollutants shall file a report thereon with the competent administrative agency, and shall not conduct business using an unreported emission facility;

Nevertheless, between July 25, 2014 and May 22, 2015, the Defendant established and operated a business site that was operated by the Defendant, from around July 25, 2014 to May 22, 2015, the separate facility volume of air pollutants from 106.64 cubic meters (the width of 4.4 cubic meters x 7.0 square meters x height of 13.3 square meters x 13.3 meters) with the competent administrative agency

2. Defendant B, at the same date, time, and place as above 1.3, Defendant A, the representative director of the Defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

3. When intending to engage in specialized environmental construction work in designing and constructing air pollution prevention facilities, the defendant shall file for registration of specialized environmental construction business with the competent administrative agency and conduct specialized environmental construction business;

Nevertheless, from the end of September 2014 to October 2014, the Defendant constructed three air pollution prevention facilities of the company located in Gwangju Northern-gu, without registering the environmental specialized construction business (380 cubic meters/divided).

4. Defendant D Co., Ltd., at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as above 3.3., C, the actual operator of the Defendant, committed the Defendant’s business as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against Defendant A or C;

1. Accusation against the violator of the atmospheric environment conservation Act;

1.A statement of officials of the F;