logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.12.12 2012고합1093
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months by imprisonment with labor for an injury, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and three years by the same year.

7. 6. The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around 04:10 on June 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a C-cub vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.264% from the section of approximately 300 meters to the viewing distance in the same Dong from the tap water viewing road near the Suwon-si transfer-dong of Suwon-si.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act driving the Ecoos car listed in paragraph (1) at the date stated in paragraph (1) and driving three lanes from the five-lane roads of the viewing distance of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the viewing distance of the front line.

At night and there was a vehicle driving along the lane adjacent to the Defendant’s moving lane, so the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle as described in paragraph (1) due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to thoroughly see the left and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, which the victim D (the age of 66) was driving, e.g., the back part of the driver’s seat and the right and duty of care to drive the vehicle, and e.g., the victim caused the injury to the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time caused the damage to the vehicle in excess of KRW 2,165,207 of the repair cost.

3. No motor vehicle owner who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated Ecoos car in its possession, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements related to D traffic accidents;

1. Request for appraisal, report on the detection of a host driver (not less than 37 pages of investigation records);

arrow