logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고정440
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) access to the Corners of the Internet website through a computer located in the office of the Defendant at Seopopo City C on October 26, 2016; (b) but E attempted to delete comments on the Internet website, and (c) deleted the comments.

In order to delete, the author gives a statement to the effect that "the victim F does not delete the comments", and then puts a statement to the effect that "if it is possible to delete the comments, confusion may occur if it is possible, and the person who caused the problem is the victim, or there is a case where he files a complaint against another person," and then puts a statement to the effect that "the other part of the victim F E is to delete the comments" in the bill of indictment, I do not need to delete it.

In order to delete, one outline must be described as "Report", but each other of the facts constituting the crime posted by the defendant is also recognized as the victim (53 pages of evidence records, etc.), and this part of the indictment contains some omissions.

I seem to appear.

In addition, in light of the contents of the defendant's defense as seen below, the omitted part is corrected ex officio as it does not have a substantial effect on the defendant's defense.

The term "this garbage has been mistakenly damaged in D."

The comments on comments, such as “I see”, were prepared and posted.

In addition, from that time until 00:17 of the same month, the Defendant’s “G” in the attached list of crimes in the same place from that time to that of 00:17 of the same month shall be corrected to “D”, and the attached table 6 “10.25.25” shall be corrected to “0.26.”

In a total of eight times, the victim openly insultd the victim by talking comments on the victim's writing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each police with respect to the complainant and the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Submission of an e-mail statement which is the complainant), investigation report (a false AC telephone statement) and criminal investigation report;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines for the crime;

arrow