(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고합11

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고합11

강제추행치상

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a single house in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City as “E”.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendant, at the second floor of the building where the two Koreas are located, he completed a consultation about the traditional wedding, and completed the victim F.S. (36 years old) that he had singled, and added the body of the victim to the wall so far as he did not see the body of the victim, and added the body of the victim to the wall in line with the suppression.

The Defendant continued to attract the victim's grandchildren, strokes the victim's strokes by strokeing the victim's strokes by hand, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim, such as raising the victim's brokes into the victim's brokes, raising the victim's brokes into the victim's brokes, and gathering the brokes by inserting his hand into the victim's brokes, and suffered the victim's injury, such as damage to the b1-day brokes and part of the brokes in the process.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Each investigation report (related to the scene of occurrence and CCTV, records of the submission of victims, and photographs in front of the E store);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not assault or threaten the victim, and that the defendant's act was done under the agreement of the victim.

Before this court, the victim made consistent and very consistent statements about major facts, such as the background leading up to the defendant and the toilet, the structure of the toilet, the contents of the defendant's crime in the toilet and the Korean-style house, etc.

In addition, the victim's statement contents are difficult to make statements without direct experience, and the victim's attitude in this law is also the victim's statement.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고합392

-수원지방법원 2017.08.07 2017고단532

-제주지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고합45

-서울동부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고합279

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2012.11.30 2012고합390