logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고단1132
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 5, 2017, at the D convenience store operated by the victim C in Seopopo City B around 20:40 on April 5, 2017, the Defendant stolen six Dooccker’s first call number equivalent to 15,00 won at which the market price had been displayed in the display stand by using a gap in which surveillance by the victim was neglected.

2. The Defendant, who had reported the cateral business at a time and place similar to paragraph 1, did not have “cateral cabarets from the new passenger cabarets.”

"Abruting with a large voice, brush caused customers to unsatisfy things, and interfere with the operation of convenience stores by force."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of the investigative report (in cases of the closure photographs of the main pages of field CCTV images), Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of view) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. All of the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant argument on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act: The following conditions are considered; in particular, the circumstances that reflects the following conditions: the Defendant agreed with the victim; the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months on October 26, 2016; and the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses only one month after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business affairs at Jeju District Court on February 24, 2017, and completed the execution of the instant punishment in the Jeju District Court on February 24, 2017; and there was a record of force of having been punished several times due to interference with business affairs.

arrow