The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

The grounds for appeal by authority shall be examined ex officio prior to the judgment.

In the first instance of the indictment, the prosecutor established a right to collateral security with a maximum amount of KRW 430 million, which is KRW 50,000,000,000, which is KRW 43550,000,000,000, and the remainder of the loan, is 350,000,000,000,000,000 won, and the defendant used the money excluding the registration expenses, by deceiving the victim as above, and allowing the victim to purchase J, Commercial Building K, and L.

As a result, it has been required to pay the amount equivalent to the same amount.

’를 ‘ 그럼에도 불구하고 피고 인은 위와 같이 피해자를 기망하여 이에 속은 피해자로 하여금 대구 달서구 J, 상가 K, L를 매수하도록 하면서 매매 계약서 상의 매매대금을 6억 8천만 원으로 기재하여 대출을 신청하도록 한 후 채무자를 피해자, 채권 최고액을 5억 1,600만 원으로 하는 근저당권을 설정하고 N 응암동 지점으로부터 4억 3,000만 원을 대출 받게 하고, 피고인은 2018. 4. 30. 피해 자로부터 40,000,000원을 ㈜X 명의 계좌로, 24,606,085원을 피고인 명의 계좌로 각 송금 받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving him as above.

2. On October 24, 2019, the first head of the facts charged, “The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Seoul Western District Court on October 24, 2019, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 1, 2019.

“.” The applicable law added “Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act” to “Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, and the appellate court granted each permission.”

Accordingly, the subject of this case is subject to a judgment.