logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.17 2016고정264
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2015, the Defendant: “2016 High 264, the Defendant, from around 13:40 on May 30, 2015 to around 14:00, was able to make it impossible for customers who had entered the restaurant by avoiding disturbance by drinking on the front of the “D cafeteria operated by the victim C,” which is operated by the victim C, on the ground that the victim does not open the entrance, and at the same time, the victim does not open the entrance, and “the cirb head will have no boomed.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

"2016, 277"

A. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around Ulsan-gu E and the victim F (n, 61 years of age) provided the following value as if he/she would have paid the alcohol value even though he/she was provided with drinking as a customer and did not have the ability to pay the said value; and (b) was provided from the victim who believed that he/she was true with the payment of the said value equivalent to KRW 500 C residual value of KRW 9,000.

B. From around 23:00 on April 2, 2015, the Defendant was interfering with business.

3. From 00:30,000 above A.

Although the victim did not pay the drinking value of KRW 9,00 at the same place as Paragraph 1, the victim did not receive the drinking value, the victim did not go to the bar, but the victim interfered with the victim's main store business by "I am to the end at the bar, I am to the end at the bar, I am to the end at the bar."

The Defendant, “2016 High-term 282,” is a person who works for daily work, and the victim H, within the “J” located in Ulsan-gu I, Ulsan-gu, is the first place between the two.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant paid the drinking value between 03:30 on July 21, 2015 and 03:55, while paying the drinking value, the Defendant did not pay the drinking value due to the shortage of balance.

Therefore, the victim is called "only while being in existence".

arrow