logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.29 2013고정3553
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 22, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driven a B Eph car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 300 meters from the street in front of a non-exclusive restaurant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to the street in front of the Cheongbuan-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon to the street in front of the Cheongbuan apartment located in the same Dong.

2. On the ground that the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, taking advantage of the fact that ordinary C’s resident registration numbers are external and similar to C:

A. On April 1, 2013, at the same place as “1,” around April 22:1, 2013, when the police officer was discovered to be the border D belonging to the Incheon Western Police Station, the traffic safety department of the Incheon Western Police Station, and when the police officer illegally used C’s name and resident registration number to the police officer with a view to evading criminal disposition against a fine twice (3.4 million won) by fraud and a central intrusion;

B. Around 22:29 on the same day as “1” and at the above place, it was discovered that the pertinent slope E, such as the above D, was drunkly used with the name and resident registration number of C, with intent to escape criminal punishment, such as fines, driving of drinking, etc.

3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

(a) When the Defendant was found to have been found to have been c at the time, time, and place, such as “2” as “A,” due to the name and resident registration number of C as he was C, thereby making D to prepare a penalty payment notice as C, with the name and resident registration number of C, and then making C sign on the electronic device (PDA) computerized;

B. When the Defendant was discovered from the slope E in the same time and place as “2” of “B,” as above, the name and resident registration number of “C” was omitted, and E was made to prepare a report on the result of the drinking driving control, and then made C sign on the electronic device (PDA) computerized input.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged C's signature on two occasions for the purpose of exercising the right and exercised it individually.

Summary of Evidence

1.

arrow