logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.12.23 2020가단8692
전세보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant's KRW 81,050,000 for the plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 10, 2020 to December 23, 2020 for the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 6, 2011, between C and D, the Plaintiff entered into a housing lease agreement with respect to F, among the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building

B. G purchased the instant building on January 11, 2013 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name on February 28, 2013.

C. The Defendant purchased the instant building on December 28, 2013 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name on January 22, 2014.

On September 9, 2020, the Plaintiff removed from F from the instant building.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff entered into the instant lease agreement with C, etc. around 201, and around March 2013, the Plaintiff agreed to increase the rental deposit of KRW 10 million between G, a purchaser of the instant building, and transferred KRW 6 million to G, with a view to increasing the rental deposit. However, G demanded the Plaintiff to transfer the relevant building without concluding the lease agreement. Accordingly, the Plaintiff requested the return of KRW 15,000,000 in total, including the amount of the down payment, the amount of the director’s expenses, and the amount of the reimbursement for the violation of the lease agreement, and KRW 85,00,000,000 in total, and the amount of the pre-existing rental deposit. Thereafter, the Defendant succeeded to the instant lease agreement by acquiring the instant building and terminated the lease agreement with the expiration of the period, etc., the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 10 million in total,00,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

There is no new lease contract between the plaintiff and G, and the defendant is related to the relationship between the plaintiff and G.

arrow