logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2021.03.10 2020고단2166
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates ‘C' on the second floor in Bupyeong-si B and 2.

1. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry through money exchange shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging money exchange or re-purchase of intangible results obtained through the use of game water;

Nevertheless, from September 2018 to March 5, 2019, the Defendant operated the said game hall, and installed 40 string in the said game room on December 2018, 2018, and inserted an IC card in the inside card input to an unspecified number of customers, and made them run a game after inserting cash into the IC card to an unspecified number of customers. After the completion of the game, the Defendant recovered the IC card in which the points obtained by the customers are stored, and made the employees, etc. exchange the remaining 10% of the points with cash to the customers, with the exception of 10% of the points.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with the above nameless female employees, exchanged the tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

2. No one who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry due to the opening or alteration of a game machine shall provide game products of a contents different from those of the game products, for the distribution or use thereof;

Nevertheless, unlike the contents of the rating classified by the head of the above game from around December 2, 2018 to March 5, 2019, the Defendant installed a 40 game machine of "Sapb Manab", the game of which was opened and altered so as to increase the table card, which is the result of the game, due to the smoke appearing in the game background screen, such as horses, protrudings, and upper terms, and let many unspecified customers use it.

As a result, the defendant provided game water different from the game water classified as rating for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure of the defendant's legal statements (as at the second public trial date) D, and police statements in relation to E;

arrow