Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall wear a label or other indicating objects in order to influence the election from 180 days before the election day to the election day.

Nevertheless, on April 3, 2016, from around 12:00 to 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) 20th election office of the 20th National Assembly National Assembly member E Party F candidate in Seoul, left in front of the election office of the 20th National Assembly member E Party candidate for the 20th National Assembly member election in Seoul; (b) Doz. F Nonppon knb hyp hyp h joint and several h joint and several hyp hyp kn. hyp hyp k. hyp hyp hyp k.

Accordingly, the defendant wearing a label to influence the election campaign.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photographs of one stage of demonstration, and images of the body’s photograph used at the time of one person’s demonstration;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in the investigation report (the location of one demonstration and the location of a candidate election office);

1. Relevant Articles 256 (3) 1 (h) and 90 (1) 2 of the Public Official Election Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not easy in that the defendant wears and posts his body seat about a specific candidate in violation of the Public Official Election Act, thereby impairing the purpose of the Public Official Election Act to maintain the fairness of the election procedure and affecting the decision-making or decision of the voters.

However, the circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime with weak perception of illegality, and the effect of the actual election result appears to have never existed, and the Defendant is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment, etc.