The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the statement of the victim E, the gist of the grounds for appeal, it is recognized that the defendant, as a result of the defendant's appearance, walked twice the body of the victim and shaking the victim's hair, thereby causing injury to the victim in collaboration with C.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case at around 18:00 on November 4, 2013, the Defendant and C: (a) divided the first class of 1 hour for the reason that the victim was not able to repay the money to the Defendant; (b) opened the front door of the victim; and (c) the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “the victim was able to remove the money within this year” and walk two times in the body of the victim; and (d) C, as the said victim opposed to the above assault, “I would like to go against our country”, the Defendant and C took left hand when the victim’s right breath of the victim’s right boom, and cut off the victim’s left part.

그런 다음 피고인은 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔들고, C는 발로 피해자의 턱과 가슴 및 어깨 부위를 7회 가량 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, inflicted injury on the victim, such as brain-dead sugar, water-saving sprink, and sprinkines requiring treatment for approximately two weeks.

3. The lower court determined that the victim’s photograph and the injury examination report are consistent with the facts that the victim suffered the same injury as the stated in the facts charged, or do not directly evidence as to whether the above injury was caused by the Defendant’s assault, but only evidence that corresponds to the facts charged that the Defendant jointly assaulted the victim. (1) The Defendant denies the fact that C was the victim, but it does not deny the fact that the Defendant was the victim, and (2) C denies itself.