A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four years and a fine of fifty million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000.

Punishment of the crime

From May 2, 2010 to December 2, 2011, the Defendant was commissioned as a member of the Korea Environment Corporation Design Deliberation Committee, while serving as Cuniversity D and the professor, and was selected as a member of the Design Advisory Committee in various design and construction package deal projects ordered by the Korea Environment Corporation, the Defendant was in charge of evaluating the design documents submitted by each company participating in the tender.

1. On January 201, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 20 million in cash from the Defendant’s laboratory located in C University S University Building E, which is located in the window of Changwon-si, to the effect that H, upon the request of G participating in the construction of the F Treatment Facilities ordered by the Korea Environment Corporation, participated in the construction of the F Treatment Facilities, which was ordered by the Korea Environment Corporation, “G consortiums with good faith in examining the design”.

2.(a)

On January 201, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 10 million in cash from the J (hereinafter “J”) to the effect that the Defendant, who participated in the construction of the F Treatment Facilities Construction Contract ordered by the Korea Environment Corporation (hereinafter “K”) that “at the time of the design review, J’s meeting is well-known,” in a vehicle parked near the J Apartment-gu, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si.

B. The defendant under the same year

1. In the lower order, L, Inc., was given and received a bribe of KRW 10 million in cash to the effect that L, Inc., in the vehicle parked near the said I apartment.

C. On April 201, 201, after the design examination was completed, the Defendant accepted a bribe of KRW 10 million in cash from the Defendant’s laboratory located in the building of the C University Grand Complex, to the effect that L is a member of the J consortium with good view.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and the witness H's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement of M, N,O, P, and Q;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a reply to the matters of witness, written examination;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning facts constituting a crime: Article 129(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 45 Subparag. 2 and Article 5-2 of the Construction Technology Management Act (the selection of imprisonment: the acceptance of bribe under paragraph (1) at the time of sale);