logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.24 2019나64473
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with the Defendant to supply labels, which are subsidiary materials of clothing, and received a request from the Defendant for supply, and supplied 2,921,600 won in total from July 2018 to August 201 of the same year. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the above goods to the Plaintiff.

2. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in each of the statements in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 10, and 15, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 12, 15, and 16 entered into a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant for the supply of clothing supplementary materials.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to supply the above subsidiary materials, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit without any need to examine the remainder.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow