1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Summary of the parties' arguments;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of construction materials, safety supplies, etc. to be used for “construction of new global unit equipment, etc. within the Chungcheong Innovation City” (hereinafter “instant supply contract”). Since the Plaintiff supplied safety supplies, etc. equivalent to KRW 91,300,000 from September 201, to May 31, 2017, to the site designated by the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the price of KRW 91,30,000 under the instant supply contract and the delay damages therefrom.

B. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Defendant did not conclude the instant supply contract with the Plaintiff, and the place of transaction with the Plaintiff is aware of the fact that it was in Seodaemun-gu.

2. The Plaintiff’s written evidence No. 1 (electronic tax invoices) submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into the instant supply contract. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, as there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.