A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 9, 2018, the Defendant suffered injury: (a) on the street in front of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on the street, “The Defendant was assaulted by two grandchildren, and interfered with their duties” (hereinafter “the Defendant’s husband”) was reported to the police officer D, who called up upon 112, arrested the Defendant’s husband E as a flagrant offender; and (b) the victim F, who is a daily driving in E, “the husband was arrested. I will not have the husband be arrested. I will not have the husband be arrested.” On the floor of hand, the Defendant got 2-3 times to 3 times from the victim’s son; (c) caused the victim’s son’s her chest on one occasion; and (d) caused the victim’s injury, such as the victim’s left kele on the treatment days, by going beyond the upper part of the victim’s chest on the floor.

2. While exercising violence against F, such as the date and time of the preceding paragraph and at a place where the performance of official duties was committed, the Defendant assaulted by the police officer, who was the police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station G District G District, about H’s hand as soon as possible, and obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Summary statement of I;

1. Notification to departments related to the 112 Incident Report and report of internal investigation (No. 1 No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. Results of responding to an order for submission of J-type Foreign Capital;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel

1. The main point of the argument is the victim F's injury not caused by the Defendant's assault, but by the victim's king evidence, etc.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed earlier, the Defendant’s assault to the victim F is sufficiently recognizable.

(1) The fact that the defendant sealed the victim at the time is not denied.

The defendant is at the time a internal investigation report prepared by K dispatched to the site at the time.