beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 24, 2007, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would give the victim B an order to receive the construction site safety management service day. However, if the present construction site service office funds are insufficient, and three million won will be lent up to September 4, 2007, then the Defendant would pay the above money without money.”
However, the defendant was unable to operate the office due to the lack of business performance of the above office, and it was difficult for the defendant to pay the above money to the victim, even if he borrowed the money from the victim, due to economic difficulties, such as credit cards, amounting to KRW 10 million.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received three million won in cash from the victim as a loan, and received five million won in cash from the bank account in the name of C in the same manner around September 14, 2007, and received 10 million won in cash from the bank account in the name of D around October 25, 2007 in the same manner.
Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of 18 million won by deceiving the victim.
2. Around July 2007, the Defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E, “A while operating F at the present price, a lot construction (ju) G was a private village, and that G was given the safety monitoring team duties at the Seoul Joint Construction Site. G was given a loan of KRW 50 million so that it can be used as the company’s operating expenses. However, since there is no money in the present place, it would be returned by calculating the operating expenses of Nice office in cash on the face of a week, and allowing it to work as a safety monitoring member.”
However, at the time, G does not have promised to do so at the end of each construction site safety surveillance group, and the defendant concluded a contract with a company subcontracted from a lot construction (ju) or lot construction.