logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.3.27.선고 2015고정46 판결
사문서위조,위조사문서행사
Cases

2015 fixed 46 Private Document Forgery and Uttering Private Document

Defendant

○ ○, Unauthorized, etc.

Residence omitted

Place of Registration omitted

Prosecutor

Maximum00 (Filing of Prosecutions), Court Decision 00 (Court Decision)

Imposition of Judgment

March 27, 2015

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant had a mind to issue a certificate of seal impression in the name of Magsung in order to transfer a motor vehicle in the name of Mag terms and conditions that died.

1. Forgery of private documents;

On November 21, 2014, the Defendant forged a document under the name of the O on rights, obligations, or certification of facts, stating that it is "Mag terms and conditions" in the letter of delegation of the certificate of the personal seal impression, ****************" on the letter of delegation of the certificate of the personal seal impression, for the purpose of exercising it within the salary 2nd Dong residents' center located in Nam-gu, Daegu-gu.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, submitted to the public official who issued the certificate of personal seal impression in the name of △ 2 dong Resident Center, which was forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of public official;

1. A proxy certificate of seal imprint;

1. Details of issuance of certificates of seal imprints and the statutes governing the issuance of certificates thereof;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, respectively.

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The type to be suspended;

Fines 300,000

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day)

1. Suspension of sentence;

Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2007

Judges

Judges Kim Gung-tae

arrow