A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2018, from around 00:20 to 02:40 on the same day, the Defendant was unable to take advantage of the Defendant’s 15 smart beauty apartment door, which was kept in the ATM device managed by the Defendant’s Saemaul Community credit cooperative located in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, with a view to thefting the money, using a bridge prepared in advance for the victim’s Saemaul, the Defendant was not a wind to dispatch the guard company’s staff, who was on duty with the above ATM device.

Thus, the defendant, at night, destroyed a part of a structure and intruded into another's property, thereby cutting down another's property, but did not commit it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Written appraisal;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to related photographs;

1. Articles 342 and 331 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14488, Apr. 1, 200

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds for reduction of the amount of punishment);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act concerning the observation of protection and order to attend lectures;