All appeals filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence, and 80 hours of social service) declared by the court below against the Defendants is too unreasonable for the Defendants, and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair for the Defendants.

2. However, this case is a case where Defendant A imported semi-finished goods, such as the original body attached with a forged trademark from the “J” in China, and made Defendant B, an accomplice, the co-offender, process it, thereby creating a forged product, and sold it. Defendant A bears a functional role in the crime of this case, such as the supply and sale of semi-finished products, and Defendant B bears partial work, and the functional role in the crime of this case, and the crime of manufacturing and selling a forged product is not good and is also serious.

In light of the following: (a) the confession of the instant crime and the depth of the Defendants were committed; (b) all the Defendants were the first offender without any criminal records; (c) Defendant B appears to have committed the instant crime upon the Defendant’s request by the pro-Japanese Defendant A; (d) the scale and method of the commission of the instant crime; (c) the method and mode of the commission of the commission; (d) the degree of profit from the commission of the instant crime; and (e) the amount of the Defendants’ age, character, conduct, and family relationship; and (e) the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the record

3. If so, the appeal against the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.