The prosecution of this case against the defendant is dismissed.

On August 13, 2019 (Evidence No. 53 of the Evidence Record), the Defendant himself/herself was dissatisfied with the Defendant on the ground that he/she did not pay monthly salary to him/her when he/she works for the Defendant Company B, and was present at the “E” company B and reported to the Ministry of Labor because he/she was unable to receive monthly salary from the first month. At that time, the Defendant’s representative is a F representative and is living for the same company, and there is no interest in the fact that the item is good, and that he/she continued to leave the low company, not the wage body. It should not be understood that it is difficult to understand why the Defendant continued to do so.

The new term of time is that human beings who do not meet the standard of time can re-be allowed to re-be a company.

무용접 프레임 시도는 좋으나 당신은 퉤퉤 벼락 맞아 뒤질 새끼임. 뒤통수 조심해 당신, 우리 동네 살잖아.

이 개XX야, 나 거기 다닐 때 우리 와이프 임신 3개월이었어. ㅅㅂ

By inserting an answer, the victim openly insultingd the victim by inserting an answer to the content that “a flusium and a flusium such as flusium and absolute monthly salary,” which read the same x flusium.”

However, the facts charged in the instant case may be prosecuted for a crime committed by applying Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and may be prosecuted only when a victim's complaint is filed pursuant to Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the record, the victim C’s complaint was withdrawn on July 16, 2020 after the prosecution was instituted on May 25, 2020 against the Defendant.

Therefore, since this case can be seen as falling under Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the prosecution of this case against the defendant is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.