beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 30, 2008, the Defendant, at the victim D’s house located in 103 Dong-dong, 804, Yansan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around Sep. 30, 2008, the Defendant “in need of money to help people grow.”
A false statement was made to the effect that “to repay money immediately from lending money.”
However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to repay the money even if they borrowed money from the injured party.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 1.5 million won from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, from the time on November 8, 201, and received a total of eight times, including the transfer of 1.5 million won from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant, from November 8, 201.
2. On December 10, 2009, the Defendant: (a) from “G” operated by the Victim F of the Victim F in Full-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., on or around December 10, 2009, the Defendant: (b) “When the husband has laid down his own land, the value is double twice a year and six months after the husband left it.”
I like this land, I would like to invest a half of the land and to invest a half of the land.
H If possible, H H H H Hah.
C. We made an investment by taking up KRW 17.1 million, HDo 17.1 million, Nado 17.1 million, and Nado 17.1 million, and made a false statement to the effect that the land was sold under the husband’s name.
However, the fact that the investment is made by the injured party.
There was no intention or ability to purchase land.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 34,100,000 won to the defendant's her husband on the same day as the purchase price for land from the victim H because he/she took charge of the victim's false statement from the victim and the victim.
3. On February 22, 2010, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to F that “I would pay a tax to pay a tax if I would pay I would like to pay I would like to pay I would like to pay I would like to pay I would like to pay I would like to I would like to the Defendant’s false statement from F.
However, fact is that there was no intention or ability to purchase land.