Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around October 5, 2015, the Defendant purchased goods equivalent to KRW 35,00,00, such as 35,00,00, from H, who is in front of G, which is located in Yangsan City F, on the street, around 11:10, October 6, 2015, he/she purchased goods of KRW 35,00,00, 50,000, which was forged as above, by purchasing goods of KRW 50,00,00,000, such as mar, mar, mar, mar, mar, etc., which was forged, from E, using a composite machine, and acquired it as food proceeds.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired forged currencies, and exercised it with the knowledge of the fact.

2. A person violating the Juvenile Protection Act was prohibited from selling alcoholic beverages, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to juveniles. However, around October 5, 2015, the Defendant provided 31,500 won to the D restaurant run by the Defendant in Yangsan-si C, which was operated by the Defendant in Yangsan-si, to the juveniles E (16 years old), I (16 years old), and J (17 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each legal statement of witness J and E;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. CCTV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the result of the CCTV verification made in the South-west market, service number);

1. Articles 210 and 207 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (a point of selling alcoholic beverages to juveniles);

1. Selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant and the defense counsel of the provisional payment order have used it as a forgery or pulmonary use. However, the Defendant’s 50,000 won in CCTV images is extremely serious.