logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.04.12 2017누14456
부당해고구제재심신청취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the following part as set forth in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this Court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court are examined, the fact-finding and the determination of the first instance court are justified). 2. A surcharge or a surcharge was added to the part.

A. In addition, the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance was set forth in the third part of the judgment, and thereafter, “The terms and conditions of the work provided to the Plaintiff were written with the oral agreement,” should be added.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow