logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2019노2858
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is only a fact that the Defendant sold a non- alcohol beverage to D, and there is no fact that the Defendant sold the beer, and the nameless female, who had been a customer, entered a room where D sing is singing, and there is no fact that the Defendant arranged for a loan for entertainment.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty by misunderstanding the facts.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages in a singing practice room as indicated in the instant facts charged and arranged a entertainment loan.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

D reported the instant crime from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court’s trial, which stated to the effect that, around September 9, 2018, the Defendant paid a total of KRW 70,000 by issuing an order of one contact loan for one hour, two cans, two drinking water, and one drinking water at a singing practice room operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant provided the beer and provided the beer and provided the beer with the beer and sing and drinking together with the beer loan.

B. According to the visual images of the video CD taken at the time, D orders the Defendant to provide a beer and drink, and the Defendant first called “Aro-scoper,” and D referred to as “Aro-scoper,” “Aro-scoper,” the Defendant called “Aro-scoper,” called “Aro-scoper,” and “Aro-scoper, 35,000 won, and KRW 70,000,000,000.” Since the Defendant directed D in a singing room and long time, it is possible to verify the fact that D scops together with D and its singing with D. The video of the above video CD conforms to D’s statement.

C. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant provided D with a non- alcohol beverage and the ordinary female customers voluntarily enter D’s singing room. However, D is ①.

arrow