logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.12.23 2015고정369
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who runs a singing practice room business.

1. Around 00:00 on January 22, 2015, the Defendant sold and provided three alcoholic beverages with a total of KRW 50,000,00,000, including beer and beer, to three customers, E, etc., within three singing practice rooms located in Guro-si, Guro-si.

2. The Defendant received a demand from three persons, such as customers E, at the time and place specified in the foregoing Paragraph (1) above, to make an influence loan from three persons, such as customers E, and provided an influence loan by receiving an influence cost per hour and having them sit together with E, etc. with drinking and singing, and arranged for an influence loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and E;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each written statement of F, G, and E;

1. An investigation report (E and F statement hearing report) (the defendant and his defense counsel merely sold alcohol to three persons, including E, a customer, etc. at the time of the instant case, and did not sell the beer and arrange for a loan. The defendant and his defense counsel denied the facts charged in the instant case. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed earlier, namely, ① F, G, and E found the instant singing room at the time of the instant case and requested the defendant to order the beer and to provide a loan. At the expense of this case, the defendant was paid 170,000 won in cash and received entertainment together with the beer loan in the instant singing room, and there was a dispute between the defendant and the defendant demanding to pay expenses (E to demand a shift of a loan).

) The contents of each statement in the presence of the police officer dispatched at the time of the instant case are true. Since G branch arbitration, G branch arbitration received a certain amount of consolation money including the payment on the day of the instant case from the Defendant and the sidewalk (the time when the police officer was investigated) and received a certain amount of money including the payment on the day of the instant case.

arrow