The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) by the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. It is recognized that the circumstances such as the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case reflects the wrong and the defendant's primary offender, the defendant's family to support the defendant, etc. are recognized.

However, the crime of this case is committed in collusion with the defendant's name-free business owner, etc. and exchanged in cash according to the points obtained by customers while operating the game room for a month. In light of the scale and method of the crime, etc., the crime related to the illegal game room does not seem to be negligible. The crime related to the illegal game room needs to be punished strictly for a very large crime of social harm, such as promoting the citizens' excessive gambling spirit and hindering sound labor consciousness. The defendant playing a so-called "brebak" in the game of this case while employing employees of the game of this case in the game of this case, etc., the degree of participation in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be uneasible. In full view of various circumstances such as the defendant's age, environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.