logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.01 2017고정3459
컴퓨터등장애업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative director of “B”, and the victim C runs an Internet advertisement via EF advertising site (G) while operating the “D”, a competitor.

EF advertising is an advertising product that, if an advertiser designates and registers a specific key key, an unspecified user is exposed to the highest search order in the order of the highest amount in the same industry when searching the key key key, and in this case, the advertiser shall include the key money in his deposit account, and if the user characters F, the amount shall be deducted according to the number of times, and if the balance is insufficient in the deposit account, the amount shall be deducted according to the number of times.

On July 7, 2017, at the defendant's house located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment I around 08:15, the defendant searched a specific key (written appraisal) in order to drop down in the F search order of the victim's above document appraiser who is a competitor, and made the victim's Internet advertising work more than 596 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from around that time to July 25, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Complaint;

1. On the basis of the records of site access, the duplicate character analysis sheet, B Internet search data, and D illegal character [According to each of the above evidence, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Internet advertising site of the said document appraiser posted in the form of EF for the purpose of interfering with the victim's advertising business by lowering the document appraiser in the order of Internet search, who is a competitor, to which the defendant is a competitor, falls in the order of Internet search, and thereby obstructing the victim's advertising business.

As a result, the defendant's act is that many unspecified general consumers are victims in the E-related system server.

arrow