1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 11, 1983, the Plaintiff owned the C’s land and divided 1) 5,405 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land before subdivision”) from Asan-si, Asan-si (hereinafter “C’s land before subdivision”).

(2) On December 21, 2001, the Plaintiff’s land was divided into three thousand square meters and two thousand square meters, namely, three hundred thousand square meters and two thousand square meters, respectively.

C On June 4, 2015, the 3,402 square meters of paddy field was divided into three: C, 92 square meters, C, 992 square meters (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”) and F, 592 square meters, G, 533 square meters, and H 1,285 square meters, respectively.

3) On June 19, 2015, the Plaintiff sold the Plaintiff’s land to I and completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 24, 2015. (B) On October 14, 1943, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the trust act on September 30, 1943, in the case of Joseon Trust Co., Ltd., Ltd., a property ownership transfer on the ground of B’s ownership and division 1) B’s 545 square meters.

on October 29, 1946, the Joseon Trust Co., Ltd. was merged with the Hansung Bank on April 25, 1950, the Korea Trust Bank on April 25, 1950, the Korea Bank on October 1, 1954, and the Korea Bank on January 1, 1960. On January 6, 199, the Korea Light Bank was merged with the Korea Light Bank on January 6, 199, and the Korea Light Bank changed the name of the defendant on May 20, 200.

2) On December 21, 2001, B, B, 545 square meters of the field, B, and B, 174 square meters of the field (hereinafter “instant dispute land”).

(C) The land of this case, F land, G land, and H land are adjoining to the port from the land of this case, and the land of this case is in the shape of a conescuous, and the remaining land is in the shape of a square road.

2) From March 11, 1983 to May 201, 2015, the Plaintiff occupied the Plaintiff’s land in this case and the land subject to the dispute in this case while cultivating them. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap’s evidence 1 to 10, Eul’s evidence 1 to 5, and Byung’s evidence 4 (including the number of each branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, video, and the purport of the whole oral proceedings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion.