logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.05 2015고단1462
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver's License) by the Defendant was a person engaged in driving of a vehicle from C Abdo-purd, and on January 17, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.052% of blood alcohol concentration without a driver's license on January 17, 2015, the road front of the E Hospital located in Gwangju North-gu D was driven by four lanes from the boundary of the new intersection to the shooting distance of the North East-gu Police Station.

At the same time, since the victim F(20 years of age) who is an auxiliary police officer was in charge of drinking control in the fourth-lane along with other auxiliary police officers, the defendant, the driver of the vehicle, has a duty of care to safely drive the victim in accordance with the above auxiliary police officer's receipt of the above auxiliary police officer in order to prevent the shock of the victim.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant received the victim’s bridge from the front driver of the Defendant’s vehicle due to his negligence while neglecting this, and suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment from the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the date and time and place indicated in paragraph (1), committed an attempt to misappropriate the name of H by advertising that he knows of H’s resident number known to the general public, on the ground that his license was cancelled due to drinking driving, which was demanded by G, a police officer of the Gwangju Northern Police Station, to obtain personal information from G, who is a police officer belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station, would have been aware of the fact of drinking and driving without a license.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant stated “H” as “H” and “H” as “H” in the letter of voluntary behavior presented by the police officer stating H’s resident registration number, etc. based on the Defendant’s statement, etc., on the basis of the Defendant’s statement, and written private document under the name of H as to the certificate of fact affixed by the police officer on his own name.

arrow