A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence 1 to 16 shall be confiscated.

from the defendant 4,100.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on May 10, 2013 due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. at Daejeon District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 10, 2013.

The Defendant is a life-free game screening business operator who sets up the program of “marine camping” containing a “marine eroding machine,” which is a speculative machine not rated from the name-free box (one name, and (C) and installs the program in an unlawful eroding machine in the game machine of the operator of the eroding game room.

1. On August 2013, the Defendant: (a) installed in the game machine 40 games a sea-bridge program, which is a speculative machine, in which the Defendant received KRW 1,200,00 from the F engaged in speculative activities by using speculative gaming machines; and (b) installed in the game machine a 40-class 40-class program, which is a speculative machine.

As a result, the Defendant sold speculative gaming machines to a person engaged in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines, and distributed game products that did not receive any rating at the same time.

2. On October 2013, the Defendant: (a) installed in the H amusement room game room operated by F in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, in the game room for the Defendant: (b) one hundred and twenty million won from F engaged in speculative activities using speculative machines; and (c) one hundred and twenty thousand won from F engaged in speculative activities using speculative machines; and (d) the sea camping program, which is a speculative machine not rated, was installed in the game machine for the Defendant

As a result, the Defendant sold speculative gaming machines to a person engaged in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines, and distributed game products that did not receive any rating at the same time.

3. On December 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was a speculative machine that received KRW 1,200,00 from the J’sJ engaging in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines in the area of a mutually influoral game operated near Daegu-gu I apartment complex; and (b) was not rated.