logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.26 2016나41569
손해배상(산)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C is the representative director of Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”), and the Plaintiff is the employee of the Defendant Company.

B. The Defendant Company was awarded a contract from the side of the D Apartment in Busan, which caused injury to the Defendant Company, such as light water and breast water damage, and the thalle of the 6th following the death of the Defendant Company, while the Defendant Company was sitting on the work plate of the balm of the balm from the ground to the 11m height of the outer wall of the apartment in the above apartment on June 20, 2012, under the management of Defendant C, who was in charge of the site, and was sitting on the falm of the falm of the falm of the falm of the apartment in the height

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” Defendant Company is a corporation established for the purpose of the business and wholesale business, and is engaged in D apartment outer wall painting painting construction, and Defendant C is the representative director affiliated with Defendant Company, who manages the safety and health affairs of the said construction business site.

1. In the event that Defendant C’s business owner installs a monthly vision, he/she shall install a safety belt and life jackets in the monthly vision in order to prevent the falling risk of workers, and in case of a structure in which a safety signal may be installed, a safety signal signal shall be installed;

Nevertheless, around June 20, 2012, Defendant C did not install safety belts and life jackets in the bridge while the Plaintiff was engaged in the outer wall paintinging work by using the bridge at the site of the marg of the marg of Busan, Seo-gu D apartment outer wall.

As a result, Defendant C did not take necessary measures to prevent risks in the places where workers might fall down at work, where soil and sand, structures, etc. might collapse, where material objects might fall or come by flying, or where other hazards may occur in the course of work due to natural disasters.

2. The defendant C’s representative’s work at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph of the defendant company is related to the defendant company.

arrow