beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In order to stabilize the residence of homeless workers, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the 2018 Highest 1410 National Land has operated a system of lending of pre-paid housing at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the pre-paid housing fund from the National Housing Fund.
On July 2013, the Defendants: (a) around July 2013, along with D and nameless E (hereinafter “D”) lending brokers (hereinafter “Brokers”), Defendant A played the role of false lessee; (b) Defendant B takes the role of false lessor; and (c) Defendant A prepared the relevant documents and the lease brokers, such as D, with the content of false employment and the contents of false contract; and (d) Defendant A submitted them to the financial institution to the financial institution, and conspired in order to receive and divide the employee’s entire housing loans from the financial institution.
According to the above conspiracy, at the G Authorized Brokerage Office located in the Hanam City F around July 8, 2013, the Defendants drafted a false apartment lease contract with Defendant B to lease “H 102 Dong 1002, 1002,00,000 won prior to the lease deposit,” and around July 29, 2013, Defendant A transferred to Defendant A a false certificate of employment with a false content written as if Defendant A was enrolled in “I” and the certificate of source collection of income tax.
Since then, on August 6, 2013, Defendant A applied for a loan for a pre-sale housing loan to a staff member in charge of loan who is unable to know his name in the office of the fact that he left the office of Han Bank, Han-ro, 15, Han-ro, Chungcheongnam-si on August 6, 2013, submitting a false employment certificate and an apartment pre-sale contract document and actually uses the loan as a pre-sale deposit.
A false statement was made.
However, in fact, Defendant A did not rent the above H 102 Dong 1002 from Defendant B, so there was no intent to use the loan as a deposit for a deposit for a deposit for a deposit for a deposit, and the Defendants made loans, such as D, etc.