The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 3, 2012, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant entered into a check contract with the mineral location point of our bank under the name of the Defendant, and is a person who entered into a check contract with the mineral location point of Korea;

A. On June 30, 2013, at the D’s pharmacy operated by the Defendant C, a check number “E”, the check amount “1,00,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance “ September 30, 2013” issued one copy of the check number per the above bank under the name of the Defendant, and the said bearer issued one copy of the check number on September 30, 2013, when the check was presented on September 30, 2013, the check was presented for payment, but the check was not paid due to the shortage of deposits;

B. A copy of the check number “F”, “1,00,000 won”, “1,00,000 won”, and “as of September 30, 2013,” issued one copy of the check number per bank under the name of the Defendant, which is the date of issuance, at the above date and place, and the said check was presented for payment of the check on September 30, 2013, which is within the time limit for presentation for payment, but the check was not paid due to shortage of deposits

C. At the above date, at the place, the check number “G”, “1,00,000 won”, “1,00,000 won”, and “the date of issuance” were issued one copy of the check number per bank in the name of the Defendant, and the said check was presented for payment of the check on September 30, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentation for payment, but the said check was presented for payment, but the check was not paid due to shortage of deposits;

D. At the above date, at the place, the check number “H”, “1,00,000 won”, “1,00,000 won”, and “the date of issuance” under the Defendant’s name, one copy of the check number per bank was issued, and the said check was presented for payment of the check on September 30, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentation for payment, but the said check did not receive any shortage of deposits; and

E. A check number I, check amount “1,00,000,000,” and a copy of the check number per bank issued under the name of the Defendant as of September 30, 2013, which is the date of issuance, was issued. The check holder offered a payment proposal on September 30, 2013, which is within the time limit for presentment of payment, but the check holder did not receive a shortage of deposit.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are governed by Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act.