Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal against the defendant, the defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment (three million won of fine) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unfasible and unjust.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant acquired profits from the crime of this case, and that the defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant underwent a heart operation twice with a compromise.

On the other hand, in light of the legislative intent of the Passenger Transport Service Act which prohibits commercial transport of private cars for the purpose of contributing to the promotion of public welfare by efficiently managing and promoting the passenger transport service, and the period in which the defendant conspired with D to transport for consideration, etc., the crime of this case is not less and less complicated. The defendant committed the crime of this case in collusion with D in collusion with D, by taking the same attitude that the defendant shall file a criminal charge of illegal passenger transport of the bareboat, and thereby withdrawing the money (the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at night). The defendant committed the crime of this case in collusion with D, etc. by taking photographs of the act of transporting private cars for consideration and filing a criminal charge on the part of the defendant's member of the organization under the secretary general and raising money for monthly membership fees. In light of these punishment records, the defendant committed the crime of this case more unfavorable to the defendant.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the offense, the means and consequence of the offense, and various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the circumstances after the offense, the lower court’s punishment is adequate, too hot or unbrupt.