The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant's timing for and reflects on each of the crimes of this case, but the defendant transported school students more than 5 times a week over 18 months using three vehicles, and the business size of commercial transport is not small, such as employment of drivers, etc. separately, and the purpose of contributing to the promotion of public welfare by efficiently managing and promoting passenger transport service, etc., the Passenger Transport Service Act which prohibits commercial transport of private cars for the purpose of contributing to the promotion of public welfare, and the legislative intent of the Passenger Transport Service Act which prohibits commercial transport by taking full account of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.