logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.11 2016나2032344
근저당권말소등기의 승낙의 의사표시
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:

The 3th 13th 13th m the Judgment of the first instance court shall add "208. mal." to the following:

(b) 4.4. The following shall be added following the first instance court decision:

Around 2007, an agreement was made to provide the plaintiffs with a regular membership card of Taean-so-so-so-so-called "Tun-so-so-called "Tun-so-so-called" club with each of the real estate stated in the attached Form, and provided only 4 copies of the "Tun-so-so-so-so-called "Tun-so-so-called" club without providing it. As such, Taean-so-so-so-called "Tun-so-so-called" is obligated to pay at least 100,000 won to the plaintiffs due to damages caused by the nonperformance of the above obligation. The plaintiffs and Tae Tae-so-so-so-so-so-so-so-so-so-so-called "The registration of the establishment of each of the instant units shall be cancelled, and the defendant shall express

(c) 5.3. The following shall be added next to the 5th judgment of the first instance.

In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Taean golfel agreed to provide the plaintiffs with the regular membership rights in selling each real estate listed in the attached Form, or agreed to offset damages liability due to the nonperformance of the above agreement and the claim for the sale price of the above unit."

(d) the first instance court’s decision 5th 4,5th 5th 4, and second 5th 1st 3th 3th 6th 6th 6th 6th 200

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit.

arrow