beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 200,000 and each of them shall be five percent (5%) per annum from March 1, 2012 to June 5, 2014; and (b) June 6, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs are the representatives of each Dong in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government W apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), and the defendant is the person who served as the female president of the above apartment of this case.
B. The plaintiffs and the defendant suffered conflict due to problems such as the operation of the funds of the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case, the composition of the representative, etc., they claimed that their actions conform to the interests of the occupants, and appealed for support to the occupants, while the other party's wrong attack and recognize that they are unfair to the occupants, etc.
C. Among them, the Defendant, upon imposing taxes on the revenues of the council of occupants' representatives, did not immediately know that one of the plaintiffs who know the details of the revenues was taxed by filing an accusation, and did not know the facts properly, and on the bulletin board of the instant apartment on November 2011, the Defendant notified the National Tax Service of the amount of taxes of KRW 2.50 million by filing an accusation against any of the Dong representative of the council of occupants' representatives to the National Tax Service. For reference, on the bulletin board of the instant apartment building, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the amount of taxes of KRW 2.50 million by raising an accusation to the National Tax Service. In addition, on the face of the walking of the amount of taxes, the Plaintiff would be entitled to the compensation of KRW 2.50 million in the amount of the collected amount. On December 3, 2011, on the bulletin board of the council of occupants' representatives of the instant apartment building, the Defendant notified the National Tax Service that the amount of taxes should be paid by accusation to the National Tax Service.
(hereinafter “each notice of this case”). D.
The defendant was convicted of a fine of one million won due to defamation by posting around December 3, 2011 and February 2, 2012, and is currently under appeal.
(Supreme Court Decision 2014Do5639).