A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

B leased Nos. 608, 514, and 613 in the name of Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on June 5, 2014, respectively, under the name of the Defendant, and arranged sexual traffic by having a large number of unspecified men who pay 11-130,000 won to engage in sexual traffic, including booms, E, F, G, and H, which are used for sexual traffic. From around that time to November 1, 2014, by having the aforementioned women engage in sexual intercourse with other unspecified men who pay 11-130,000 won.

B decided on November 2014, 2014, the Defendant introduced through I to the effect that “The Defendant was affected by the crackdown on the operation of an officetel sexual traffic business establishment, and only one room was confirmed to have been involved. It was examined by the prosecution.” The Defendant said to the effect that “The Defendant will take KRW 10 million on the face of an investigation by the prosecution.”

According to the above B’s teachers, around March 13, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer in charge of the investigation of the Daejeon Police Station and in the intelligence team office located in the Seo-gu Daejeon-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, and caused the police officer to escape B who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by stating that “at home engage in sexual traffic business from October 4, 2014 to November 1, 2014.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect as to B by the prosecution (third time, and comparison with the defendant);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or accused;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Application of lease contract (No. 608) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is a false lease agreement stating that the defendant would receive the teacher of B and make a false statement, thereby obstructing the proper exercise of investigation authority. The crime is not easy in light of the course, motive, mode, etc. of the crime, and the defendant's multiple sentence.